| PROGRAMME LEARNING OUTCOMES |
| KNOWLEDGE |
Aim |
Objectives | T |
% |
| (Described in terms of theoretical and factual knowledge) |
1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| 1 |
Comprehend the public administration theories and practices. | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 15 | 50.00 |
| 2 |
Use basic legal knowledge within the discipline of public administration. | 2 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 17 | 56.67 |
| 3 |
Compherend the structure of public administrative organization of Turkey. | 0 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 14 | 46.67 |
| 4 |
Analyze traditional public administration understanding and new public management trends. | 4 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 15 | 50.00 |
| 5 |
Make comparison between different public administration in the world and the public administration system in Turkey. | 5 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 18 | 60.00 |
| 6 |
Evaluate the discipline of public administration with different disciplines such as management sciences, political science, business management and law. | 4 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 15 | 50.00 |
| SKILLS |
Aim |
Objectives | T |
% |
| (Described in terms of cognitive and practical skills) |
1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| 1 |
Analyze the structure of the Turkish administrative organization. | 3 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 14 | 46.67 |
| 2 |
Interpret the Turkish public administration practices in the relation to universal public administration theories. | 2 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 15 | 50.00 |
| 3 |
Interpret the Turkish public administrative organization, administrative and managerial tradition comparatively with different examples in the world. | 0 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 18 | 60.00 |
| 4 |
Identify the defencies in practices in the field of public administration and develop strategic solution proposals. | 2 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 14 | 46.67 |
| 5 |
Prepare reports and transfer information in the field of the public administration. | 0 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 15 | 50.00 |
| 6 |
Study in the field of public administration planned, programmed and critical analyzes and do observations. | 3 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 36.67 |
| PERSONAL & OCCUPATIONAL COMPETENCES IN TERMS OF EACH OF THE FOLLOWING GROUPS |
Aim |
Objectives | T |
% |
| Autonomy & Responsibility |
1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| 1 |
Respond the issues about the field with ethical sensitivity to matters such as ecological and human rights. | 0 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 15 | 50.00 |
| 2 |
Take initiative in solving problems in the field of public administration. | 2 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 36.67 |
| 3 |
Use potentialand competence of leadership. | 0 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 43.33 |
| 4 |
Establish a casuality between events and facts. | 3 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 13 | 43.33 |
| Learning to Learn |
1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | T | % |
| 1 |
Follow the actual theoretical approaches in the discipline. | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 14 | 46.67 |
| 2 |
Access to actual sources in the discipline. | 3 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 15 | 50.00 |
| 3 |
Support the knowledge on the discipline with a lifelong learning competence. | 2 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 13 | 43.33 |
| Communication & Social |
1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | T | % |
| 1 |
Communicate in mother tongue and at least one foreign language. | 2 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 14 | 46.67 |
| 2 |
Engage in teamwork and division of labor. | 3 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 13 | 43.33 |
| 3 |
Apply scientific and social ethical values. | 0 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 14 | 46.67 |
| Occupational and/or Vocational |
1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | T | % |
| 1 |
Use scientific research methods in an efficient manner and with respect to academic norms | 4 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 15 | 50.00 |
| 2 |
Apply knowledges about research methods within software packages. | 0 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 23.33 |
| 3 |
Analyze national and international managerial and administrative problems. | 2 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 14 | 46.67 |
| Related number of programme learning outcomes/ 25 | 17 | 11 | 20 | 20 | 8 | 20 | - | - |
|---|
| Level of contribution | 51 | 40 | 76 | 77 | 34 | 74 | - | - |
| *Level of Contribution (0-5): Empty-Null (0), 1- Very Low, 2- Low, 3- Medium, 4- High, 5- Very High |
